C# IList Kullanımı Günlükler

C# IList Kullanımı Günlükler

Blog Article

You cannot predict the future. Assuming that a property's type will always be beneficial kakım a List is immediately limiting your ability to adapt to unforeseen expectations of your code.

Başarım Optimizasyonu: IList, bilgi erişimini optimize ederek uygulamanın başarımını fazlalıkrabilir ve kafa yönetimini iyileştirebilir.

If someone passes you an Array or a List, your code will work fine if you check the flag every time and have a fallback... But really; who does that?

If you think that interfaces are useful only for building over-sized, grandiose architectures and have no place in small shops, then I hope that the person sitting across from you in the interview isn't me.

In the end, you might need to replace an implementation for any reason; performance is just one possibility. Regardless of the reason, using the least-derived type possible will reduce the need for changes in your code when you change the specific run-time type of your objects.

Buraya ilgi etmenizi istiyorum. Liste tipine textbox dedik ve listeye textbox eklerken de dikme nesne adını verdik. Doğrusu text özelliğini felan vermedik. Dikme nesnenin kendisini verdik. Şimdi bu emekin tatlıca doğrusu şu;

+1 for all of us who hate it C# IList Nerelerde Kullanılıyor when a small app is loaded with interfaces and clicking on "find definition" takes us somewhere OTHER than the source of the mesele... Can I borrow the phrase "Architecture Astronauts"? I emanet see it will come in handy.

Matthew WatsonMatthew Watson 108k1111 gold badges170170 silver badges290290 C# IList Nasıl Kullanılır bronze badges 2 2 This is trivially true for every interface. If you want to follow through with your argument, than you could argue to never use any interface at all, because some implementation of it might throw.

If you started with a concrete type and you decided to change to another one, even if it uses the same interface, you're going to break someone else's code unless you started off with an interface or abstract base type. Share Improve this answer Follow

If you emanet consider your method, determine that you probably won't be changing the return collection type, then it is probably safe to return a more exact type. If you aren't sure, or are afraid that if you change it in future you'll be breaking other people's code, then go more general.

Bir ahir elementin varlığını sınayan MoveNext ve makbul elementi C# IList Kullanımı veren GetCurrent metodlarına sahiptir.

Returning a read-only interface such as IEnumerable is often the way to go for data-retrieval methods. Your consumer yaşama project it into C# IList Nerelerde Kullanılıyor a richer type as-needed.

for your return types. This gives your callers the most flexibility in passing in types to your methods and the most opportunities to cast/reuse the return C# IList Nerelerde Kullanılıyor values.

It doesn't affect the signature of the method, and is grup in stone at compile time. You should instead be helping him get over his confusion about declaring his local like IList foo = new List - this is where his confusion clearly lies.